Somebody who is using 'Lakh' as a quantity probably does not know its limited usage.

Should the diligent question editor remove 'Lakh' and multiply the quantity by 100,000 to make the question clearer to a broader audience? Or alternatively comment? Or alternatively flag?

What are the best practices for the diligent editor on the usage of 'Lakh'?

The question scope is includes the use of thousand separators for large numbers.

Adding 22 April 2015


The consensus given by the answers below is...

  1. Lahks (and implicitly crores) should be expanded into decimal units;
  2. Commas should be used as the thousands separator;
  3. Decimal points should be used as the fractional separator
  4. Any other conversions (such as metric to imperial or fahrenheit to celsius) are not affected by this question. The question scope is limited to Lahks (and implicitly crores) only.

"So it shall be written. So it shall be done." (Rameses II)

  • 5
    I already changed 3 Lakh into 300'000 before I saw this question. I think we once agreed to use units, numbering systems, etc. that are commonly understood by the community here, e.g. SI units. Apr 14, 2015 at 19:18
  • But then where does it end? Should we change miles, feet, Fahrenheit to the metric system?
    – Mr Lister
    Apr 19, 2015 at 13:05
  • 4
    @MrLister, it stops after you change Lakh and put commas in.
    – Gayot Fow
    Apr 19, 2015 at 14:32

3 Answers 3


I would say yes. The usage of "lakh" as a unit is fairly limited, to the Indian subcontinent. For the sake of clarity, it makes sense to convert it into a digit grouping system that's widely understood.

Informally, we've had similar discussions in comments in the past about the usage of commas versus dots in digit grouping. I don't think we have a specific stance on this; it's usually dependent on the author but we veer towards using commas instead of dots since more countries in the world use that system. (Although one could say the most populous countries use the "dot".)

  • 4
    For commas versus dots, how many countries (or even people) use any given system isn't really relevant. This is an English-language site and English orthography uses comma or space as the thousands separator and dot as the decimal. Apr 18, 2015 at 12:50
  • 1
    The .NET 'Invariant Culture' implements your suggestions. It uses commas as a separator and a period as a decimal. Even though the .NET 'Invariant Culture' is an artificial one, it's a great place to anchor your ideas to something halfway "official" and "widely recognized". Just a comment...
    – Gayot Fow
    Apr 18, 2015 at 13:36

I've personally come across Lakhs on both Stack Overflow and Travel SE. I always edit them into their base 10 representation. Whilst commas and dots for decimals are often rendered unambiguous by the context in which the number is used - 100,000 USD is clearly one-hundred-thousand dollars, rather than one-hundred-with-three-decimals dollars (as far as I know few currencies use 1e-3 precision) - Lakhs (and Crores for that matter) are features of the Indian decimal system and can therefore be confusing and/or ambiguous to those that are not familiar with them.

  • 5
    Lakhs, crores and Indian-style digit grouping may well be confusing to people outside south-east Asia but they're not ambiguous. Apr 18, 2015 at 12:56

English uses comma or space as a thousands separator and period as a decimal separator. I wouldn't advocate editing posts just to change separators (unless they were causing confusion) but I would encourage people write their numbers using English orthography, given that they're writing all the words in English.

Lakhs and crores are a slightly different case. Although they are used a lot in English, that use is restricted to South Asia, a region that doesn't seem to have a lot of Stack Exchange users. Since most people on Stack Exchange don't seem to be familiar with these concepts, or the associated digit grouping scheme (e.g., 1,23,45,678) I agree with the other answers that it's probably best to avoid using lakhs and crores and to edit them away (or at least give a translation).

In terms of actual writing style here, it's much easier to use commas than spaces as a grouping separator. If you use spaces, you have to make you don't get word-wrapping between groups, which means using some kind of non-breaking space. The standard HTML non-breaking space   is rather too wide (e.g., 1 234 567) and non-breaking thin spaces   look nice (e.g., 1 234 567) but it's hard to remember the code. Organizations that recommend spaces as separators mostly seem to recommend non-breaking thin spaces (e.g., the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry and the American Medical Association; see references here).

  • 1
    I think you mean South Asia (India, Pakistan & friends); SE Asia (Thailand etc) does not use lakhs, crores, etc. Apr 20, 2015 at 14:25
  • @jpatokal Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. Apr 20, 2015 at 16:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .