I've noticed a couple of questions about train stations in the past few days and we don't really have an appropriate tag though obviously they're going to be a pretty important travel topic.
Most questions about stations have also been about trains so using the trains tag was obvious. But some questions are only about the stations and don't mention trains at all.
I propose broadening the trains to rail so that it will also include stations regardless of whether or not trains are also part of the question.
stations
fromtrains
be "nice"? So you could also use the former for cattle stations and radio stations? We don't need astations
tag - we only need arail
tag because that inherently, historically, and unexceptionally covers stations, trains, engines, cabooses, tracks, platforms, engineers, different guages, and Thomas the Tank d-; – hippietrail Dec 6 '13 at 8:42toilet-usage
tag? I really don't get what the benefit you see could possibly be. People interested in train station questions getting annoyed at all the non-station train questions in their inbox??\-:
– hippietrail Dec 6 '13 at 17:13air-travel
=>rail-travel
,airports
=>train-stations
,aircraft
=>trains
, then we have a tag for each airline and each major aircraft builder. I think that's mostly pragmatic except for the manufacturers, but I don't think splitting up train stuff is as pragmatic. – hippietrail Dec 7 '13 at 2:38