Timeline for Why Rio de Janeiro question open and upvoted, but not South East Asia seaside golf course?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 8, 2020 at 19:05 | comment | added | Chris H | for what it’s worth - not that it’s really any of your business, but I can already see the accusations of hypocrisy or double-standards coming if it goes unmentioned - I downvote more or less every “identify this” question I see (including the Rio one), because I don’t believe they belong on the site for reasons I’ve explained previously. | |
Oct 8, 2020 at 19:02 | comment | added | Chris H | It’s my opinion based on numerous factors. Primarily because - unlike you - they aren’t a blatantly obvious sock puppet of somebody who has been suspended multiple times on multiple accounts on multiple SE sites, yet continues with exactly the behaviour that got them suspended. | |
Oct 1, 2020 at 10:02 | history | edited | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:59 | history | edited | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 267 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2020 at 8:52 | history | edited | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 267 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2020 at 7:05 | history | edited | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2020 at 6:35 | history | edited | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2020 at 6:29 | history | edited | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 162 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2020 at 6:23 | history | edited | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 238 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2020 at 6:18 | history | answered | Chris H | CC BY-SA 4.0 |