Timeline for Do we need to completely reform our mod team?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 11, 2018 at 0:54 | comment | added | Shog9 | The official stance of SE is that anyone who feels they were suspended unfairly can bring the matter up for discussion with the moderator team (publicly or privately), the community as a whole (here on meta), or the SE team (privately as provided by the "contact" link at the bottom of most every page). We cannot recommend that discussion be carried out via 3rd-parties or via an off-site blog. Remember that the moderator team was elected to serve the entire community here; accusations of malfeasance against one should thus be brought before either the electorate or their representatives. | |
Jan 11, 2018 at 0:47 | comment | added | user4188 | And one of those mods were a mistake; and the rest are simply guilty of not stopping him. And so the official stance of SE is that if a moderator doesn't work out is to do nothing and if someone takes a stand against him then he is petty? Interesting. | |
Nov 22, 2017 at 17:21 | history | answered | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |