Timeline for The tag [rationale] has no rationale
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://travel.stackexchange.com/ with https://travel.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 17, 2016 at 16:25 | comment | added | JonathanReez Mod | @pnuts the mods can terminate a tag if they wish to do so. I'm not trying to break the rules. But until [rationale] isn't officially banned, I'd say it's fair play to keep using it. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 9:44 | comment | added | Fiksdal | @Gilles Ah, I see. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 9:41 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @Fiksdal No, I'm saying that whether to apply the tag or not is subjective and therefore the tag is pointless. I'm not saying anything about the questions. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 9:36 | comment | added | Fiksdal | There sure are a lot of fun, interesting questions under that tag. @Gilles , is your point that it would be too hard to objectively distinguish between useful questions and non-useful question? So people could ask almost anything? | |
| Apr 26, 2016 at 11:35 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | “rules or behaviours which seem unreasonable to many travelers” is a highly subjective characterization. Most of the questions with this tag don't seem to be about unreasonable or even surprising practices to me. I don't see the connection with human activities, either. | |
| Apr 26, 2016 at 11:04 | history | answered | JonathanReezMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |