Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://travel.stackexchange.com/ with https://travel.stackexchange.com/
Apr 9, 2016 at 1:31 comment added user29097 @CMaster: I never really had that question about VFS, you know. My question was purely about onward vs return. It emerged during the discussion of specifics that VFS might have a problem with it. Whereas the 'canonical' never even mentions VFS. And that is exactly my point, if you shut down the specific situational questions then how will such specific answers emerge?
Apr 8, 2016 at 17:14 comment added CMaster @Pranab Every one of those should be following the Schengen rules. So the relevant question is about whether VFS enforce the rules properly/other rules. The existing quesiton answers on the rules that shoould concern of all of them.
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:53 comment added user29097 @drat Is it not simpler to allow for an answer discussing all the major potential problems with return v/s onward tickets to the Schengen zone, given that I might actually not know which other parties may have problems. Do we really favour 5 questions, one for the interviewer, one for VFS, one for the airline, one for the Indian emigration check, and one for the Swiss border guard?
Apr 8, 2016 at 14:30 answer added CMaster timeline score: 3
Apr 8, 2016 at 8:57 history edited JoErNanOMod
edited tags
Apr 8, 2016 at 8:41 comment added drat I think the main issue with the question is that it asks a couple of questions as one question. I agree with you that the answer to the canonical question only answers a part of your question, but I would also say that your question should probably be split up. The question about the airline having problems with your onward instead of return ticket for instance is IMO a separate question.
Apr 8, 2016 at 7:33 answer added Gayot Fow timeline score: 4
Apr 8, 2016 at 6:56 history asked user29097 CC BY-SA 3.0