Timeline for Are questions about a specific travel books off topic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://travel.stackexchange.com/ with https://travel.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 6, 2014 at 1:47 | comment | added | Mark Mayo | A recent example of a request to change our twitter agent was approved and actioned, for example | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 1:46 | comment | added | Mark Mayo | @GayotFow oh yeah, meta.SO is scary, but fortunately I'm talking about OUR meta.travel.SE :) We've raised a few in the past (eg wikitravel links auto expand in the chat) and had them approved, and it's a bit less scary, I think :) | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 22:25 | comment | added | Gayot Fow | @MarkMayo, I'm grateful for your offer to upvote a feature-request, but 939 days on SO to date have taught me that it's the fastest way to draw vengeance and punishment down votes. If Travel.SE can't do it without a feature-request, we should drop the idea. BUT, and a very big BUT, I would love to see the answer to the OP's question. Totally love it. | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 10:40 | comment | added | Mark Mayo | @GayotFow nothing silly about that, if you make a new meta post and tag it feature-request they'll usually respond and take a look (I'd vote it up). Of course, whether or not people read that statement, given how many people put questions in answer posts, is a different story :/ | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 10:39 | comment | added | Mark Mayo | Yeah fairly sure he's just referring to puzzling there. As he points out, puzzling wouldn't work if they didn't. Similar to some of the approaches seen on codegolf. But they're built for that (community-wise). | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 6:02 | comment | added | skv | meta.puzzling.stackexchange.com/a/1612/2313 is the answer from the community director indicating that SE is slightly flexible now with the formats | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 5:14 | comment | added | skv | @MarkMayo I would like to point that SE is gradually relaxing that norm, not may be for every site, but we had this discussion in Puzzling recently and moreover CodeReview is all about discussion (though it was meant to be a discussion from day 0) | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 3:29 | comment | added | Gayot Fow | Probably a silly question, but will they allow you to add another line beneath it? | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 3:07 | comment | added | Mark Mayo | Sadly that text 'we prefer questions that can be answered, not discussed' is common across the entire SE site, we can't customise it ourselves :( | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 0:10 | history | answered | Gayot Fow | CC BY-SA 3.0 |